Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Education
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Education
  Education for All
  Access & Inclusion
  Skills & Training
  ICTs
  Health & HIV/AIDS
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Using schools to overcome sectarian conflict

Sectarian conflict makes its way into the classroom. Segregated schools are both a symptom and a cause in societies split by racial, class and religious divisions. Recent research shows, however, that re-thinking education policy could make learning institutions more widely accessible and diverse, and make schools a positive force for change in divided societies.

A report from the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) examines the link between education and conflict and analyses the practice of key international agencies. The authors argue that that there has been a tendency to view education as a force for good without acknowledging that it can also create the conditions for strife.

Of the estimated 113 million children not in school worldwide, 82 per cent are living in crisis and post-crisis countries. At Dakar in 2000, international educators belatedly recognised the issue of conflict as an obstacle to the achievement of the goal of ‘Education for All’ and noted how education can play a key role in preventing conflict and building peace.

Segregated schools are common in many countries divided by conflict. This segregation limits the opportunities for young people from different groups to interact and reinforces separate identities. Some examples offered by the report include:

  • In Nepal, poor state education provision fuelled the rapidly increasing private sector, a symbol of privilege which helped to stimulate the Maoist insurgency and made education a battleground as rebels have attacked both state and private schools.
  • In Burundi, where conflict has destroyed a quarter of primary schools, Tutsi leaders made education the exclusive preserve of their particular social group by manipulating the allocation of resources and promoting the use of the French language: some external agencies were inadvertently involved in supporting this elitist approach.
  • Tamil teachers in Sri Lanka are concerned about the cultural bias in Sinhalese textbooks translated into Tamil.
  • Post-conflict decentralisation risks reigniting hatreds: in Bosnia it has allowed nationalist politics to influence curricula, textbooks, appointments and access.
  • Religious codes often assign a subordinate role to women, raising concerns about unequal access to faith-based education for girls.

The ‘emergency’ provision of exercise books and pencils might be valid at a critical stage but may also distract from the longer-term provisioning of education systems able to meet the needs of diverse groups on an equitable basis. The report argues that the nature of modern conflict requires a system-wide education analysis to be more deeply integrated into all forms of conflict response.

Among the many recommendations are calls for:

  • priority to be given to making schools a central part of rebuilding projects
  • greater international co-ordination and flexibility in aid budgets: education should no longer be excluded from emergency budgets
  • a move towards history being taught as a discipline involving the interpretation of evidence rather than as a narrative of the ‘national story’
  • conflict-sensitive recruitment and deployment policies to ensure the employment of male and female teachers from different ethnic and language groups
  • efforts to make schools safe and welcoming for adolescent girls and disabled children
  • education programmes for the demobilisation and reintegration of child soldiers.

 

Source(s):
‘Education, conflict and international development’, Department for International Development (DFID), by Alan Smith and Tony Vaux, January 2003 Full document.

Funded by: DFID (Joint project between Education and Conflict and Humanitarian Aid Department (CHAD, Ref: CNTR 01 3022)

id21 Research Highlight: 5 January 2004

Further Information:
Alan Smith
School of Education
University of Ulster
Coleraine Campus
Cromore Road
Coleraine
Co. Londonderry
BT52 1SA
Northern Ireland

Tel: +44 (0)28 70323593
Fax: +44 (0)28 9036 6806
Contact the contributor: a.smith@ulster.ac.uk

School of Education, University of Ulster

Tony Vaux
Humanitarian Initiatives
Timbertop, Churchfields,
Stonefields,
Oxon,
OX 29 8PP

Tel: +44 (0) 79 90521315
Contact the contributor: vauxt@aol.com

Other related links:
Enabling Education Network

Academy for Educational Development

World Education Organisation

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 25th August 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org

 

 

Go to the School of Education, University of Ulster site.