|
|
||||||||||||||||
Adult education programmes developed for or by indigenous communities rarely address gender inequalities. Programmes often aim to promote indigenous people’s rights, including bringing together communities who are actually differentiated along lines of gender, class and age. Despite their commitment to adjusting unequal power relations, course designers rarely mention gender. A paper from the UK’s University of East Anglia draws on studies of indigenous adult education in Asia to highlight the importance of participatory forms of education in including gender while addressing the needs of various indigenous groups. Adult education is often provided as cheaply as possible. The fact that many indigenous people drop out of courses shows the need for greater investment in high-quality education. In all countries with reliable data there is a consistent gap between the literacy rates of the indigenous and non-indigenous populations. Although many Asian governments are now committed to increasing education for indigenous groups, interventions are often uncoordinated and fail to address fundamental issues – particularly the question of language of instruction. UNESCO has argued that education must be taught in the mother tongue of indigenous communities. However, this may not be the best approach, especially for adult students motivated to learn the dominant official language. In some cases where mother tongue teaching has been promoted, community members worry that their lack of access to a language of power will reaffirm their low status, make it harder to influence state institutions and reduce employment prospects. The authors present evidence that:
Indigenous and tribal peoples are often minority groups – India’s 400 tribal groups make up eight percent of the country’s population. Those who plan and deliver education services often overlook the differences within communities and take a fixed view of indigenous education as a way to preserve language and culture, rather than as a potential opportunity for change. Programme planners and tutors therefore need to:
Source(s): Funded by: UNESCO id21 Research Highlight: 7 April 2006
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0)1603 592333 School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia (UEA), UK
Anna Robinson-Pant Tel:
+44 (0)1603 5923857 Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia (UEA), UK Other related links:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||