|
|
||||||||||||||||
Literacy programmes generally focus on rural areas. It is often forgotten that a large proportion of the world’s 800 million non-literate people live in urban areas. Relatively few programmes are designed to meet the needs of poor residents of slum neighbourhoods, many of whom require literacy skills in a second language. A book from UNESCO’s Institute for Education presents findings from a two-year international research project which explored linkages between urbanisation and literacy and the ways in which literacy is sought and employed in individual lives and livelihoods. Contributors from nine countries show it is easy to claim to make urban residents literate, but much more challenging to create and sustain literate communities. The city itself is a message about literacy – with advertisements, newspapers, bills to pay, forms to fill in, printed materials on sale, car and bus number plates and shop signs. There are many more focal points for literacy – government offices, post offices, health centres and places of worship – than in villages. Because literacy tasks and activities play a large part in the life of cities, so literacy plays a large part in the construction and reconstruction of identities. In cities it is the non-literates who stand out. They are more likely to develop a sense of failure, of exclusion, of dysfunctionality than in rural areas where there may be some sense of solidarity among the illiterate. Most countries now generate statistics on the number of literates and illiterates in urban and rural areas but they are generally unreliable. Some censuses simply ask people if they feel ‘literate’ while others assume that a certain number of years of school necessarily makes somebody sustainably literate. It is often forgotten that in multi-lingual cities some newly-arrived people judged to be ‘literate’ are effectively ‘illiterate’ in their new context. The editor of the collection shows that:
Over-generalised bureaucratic approaches to literacy learning must be abandoned. Governments and aid agencies should not launch special generic programmes for urban dwellers. That would be as foolish as the current policy in many countries of providing a single adult literacy learning programme. It is important to:
Source(s): Funded by: Association of Commonwealth Universities, UK Department for International Development and UNESCO id21 Research Highlight: 26 September 2005
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0)1603 591451 School of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of East Anglia, UK
UNESCO Institute for Education Tel:
+49 40 44804123 UNESCO Institute for Education Other related links:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||