Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Education
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Education
  Education for All
  Access & Inclusion
  Skills & Training
  ICTs
  Health & HIV/AIDS
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Partnerships will improve girls’ education

The Millennium Development Goal to achieve gender equality in education can only be met by concerted action. Stronger partnerships are needed to increase opportunities for the millions of girls and women excluded from education, but what kind?

A book published by Oxfam GB documents and analyses the challenges and problems in building partnerships for girls’ education. For example, can local initiatives be replicated without losing the community involvement that contributed to their success? Is equal enrolment of boys and girls enough to promote gender-equitable education or contribute to women’s empowerment?

Of the 128 countries monitoring gender parity in education, 54 still have more boys than girls enrolled. In Ethiopia, Niger, Pakistan and Chad, for example, enrolment ratios for girls are two thirds of those for boys. Only 18 countries in Central and West Africa, South and West Asia and Arabic states have a realistic chance of achieving gender parity by 2015.

Authors examine global and regional partnerships to promote gender-equitable education through greater co-ordination. They include:

  • Partnerships in Peru which have moved from focusing on access to the quality and relevance of schooling and the need for indigenous people’s control.
  • Bangladesh civil society activists who have fought to win official recognition of schools run by non-governmental organisations.
  • The Global Campaign for Education (GCE), a broad coalition of civil society including trade unionists and children’s rights activists.
  • The Forum for African Women Educationalists, a network of influential women decision-makers working to raise awareness and pilot methods of quality provision.
  • The Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED) in sub-Saharan Africa, establishing links between communities and building local confidence and skills to ensure a smooth transition for girls from primary education to a productive adulthood.
  • The UN Girls’ Education Initiative (UNGEI), the largest and most prestigious partnership, launched by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan at the World Education Forum in Dakar in April 2000.

A large number of initiatives can create confusion. UNGEI has been overwhelmed by lack of funds, confusion about roles and responsibilities, disagreement whether engagement should be focused at the national or at the regional level and failure to link effectively with the FTI. Within the GCE there are disagreements about how to prioritise multiple interests – those of teachers and poor communities, for example.

It is important to recognise that:

  • Partnerships can be characterised by imbalances of power: when governments work with small NGOs junior partners may become assimilated and lose their identity.
  • Poor communities – and within them minority people and girls themselves – must be active partners in coalitions intended to benefit them.
  • Actors in partnerships may need to surrender their individual identity, if only temporarily, and work towards a mutually negotiated plan.
  • Loose alliances tend to work better than tight, bureaucratic arrangements: alliances of organisations with similar ideologies and visions tend to work best.
  • All partners, especially those who are well resourced, need to invest time, funds, and people to make partnerships work.

Source(s):
‘Partnerships for Girls’ Education’, edited by Nitya Rao and Ines Smyth, Oxfam GB, 2005 Full document.

Funded by: Oxfam GB

id21 Research Highlight: 20 March 2006

Further Information:
Nitya Rao
School of Development Studies
University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1603 592333
Contact the contributor: n.rao@uea.ac.uk

University of East Anglia, UK

Ines Smyth
International Policy Department
Oxfam GB
274 Banbury Road
Oxford OX2 7DZ
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1865 313939
Contact the contributor: ismyth@Oxfam.org.uk

Oxfam GB

Other related links:
'Understanding cross-sector partnerships for development'

'Missing the targets: poor progress on the MDGs'

'Closing gender gaps in education: lessons from good practice'

United Nations Girls' Education Initiative (UNGEI)

Girls’ Education: Working with Partners to Meet the Challenge from the World Bank

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 18th August 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org

 

 

Go to the University of East Anglia, UK site.

 

 

Go to the Oxfam GB site.