Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Education
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Education
  Education for All
  Access & Inclusion
  Skills & Training
  ICTs
  Health & HIV/AIDS
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Time to tackle corruption in education

In some developing countries massive amounts of funds transferred from ministries of education to schools are leaked. Bribes and payoffs in teacher recruitment and promotion and selling of exam papers can bring the teaching profession into disrepute. Illegal payments for school entrance and other hidden costs help explain low enrolment and high drop-out rates.

Research from UNESCO’s International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) argues that the problems posed by corruption in education have been neglected for too long. It aims at integrating governance and corruption concerns into educational planning and administration.

In education, as in other sectors, corruption thrives when there is lack of competition among providers, complex but unaccountable regulation systems, limited access to information, low salary levels for public employees and weak incentive systems. Decentralisation, privatisation and sub-contracting – which might have been expected to lead to greater accountability – appear to be offering new opportunities for corruption.

The IIEP research maps corruption opportunities in the education sector. Corruption can involve all areas of planning and management – building and maintenance of schools, recruitment, promotion, teacher incentives, the supply and distribution of equipment and textbooks, allocation of allowances, examinations and out-of-school activities. Unregulated private tutoring can become a major industry, consuming a considerable amount of parents’ money and pupils’ time, distorting the curriculum and undermining the goal of equality of opportunity in education.

Teachers can be encouraged to help curb malpractice and to recognise the importance of ethical standards and professional integrity. A survey conducted in Bangladesh, India and Nepal shows that teachers and administrators welcome codes of conduct if they are developed through a participatory process involving the teaching profession. Successful enforcement of codes requires a clear definition of their aims, wide dissemination, and professional controls for their implementation, clear sharing of responsibilities and training of education personnel.

In some instances strengthening control mechanisms and regulatory bureaucracy can paralyse administration and encourage new varieties of corrupt practices. Improving access to information and giving citizens a voice in education management are essential for improving transparency and accountability in the use of educational resources.

The report concludes that the complex and sensitive issue of corruption in education should be addressed by:

  • Regulatory systems: involving adapting existing legal frameworks to focus more on corruption, designing clear norms and criteria for procedures (such as fund allocation or procurement), codes of practice for the education profession, and defining well-targeted measures.
  • Strengthening management capacities: involving increasing institutional capacities in various areas, particularly information systems, setting up effective control mechanisms against fraud as well as promoting ethical behaviour.
  • Enhanced ownership of the management process: involving developing decentralised and participatory mechanisms, increasing access to information, particularly with the use of ICTs, and empowering communities to give them stronger “social control”.

Source(s):
‘Ethics and Corruption in Education: An Overview’, Journal of Education for International Development, by Jacques Hallak and Muriel Poisson, 2005 Full document.
‘Academic fraud and quality assurance: facing the challenge of internalisation of higher education’, IIEP Series on Ethics and corruption in education, by Jacques Hallak and Muriel Poisson, 2005 Full document.
‘Corrupt schools, corrupt universities: what can be done?’ IIEP Series on Ethics and corruption in education, by Jacques Hallak and Muriel Poisson, forthcoming 2006

Funded by: IIP-UNESCO, Norad, Open Society Institute, The World Bank, The World Bank Institute, Utstein Anti-Corruption Resource Centre

id21 Research Highlight: 28 April 2006

Further Information:
Jacques Hallak and Muriel Poisson
Ethics and corruption in education
International Institute for Educational Planning
(IIEP-UNESCO)
7-9, rue Eugène-Delacroix
75116 Paris, France

Tel: +33 (1) 45 03 77 13
Fax: +33 (1) 40 72 83 66
Contact the contributor: j.hallak@iiep.unesco.org

Contact the contributor: m.poisson@iiep.unesco.org

Contact the contributor: etico@iiep.unesco.org

Ethics and Corruption in Education, IIEP, UNESCO

Other related links:
ETICO information platform on “Ethics and corruption in education

‘Ethics and Corruption in Education: Results From The Expert Workshop Held at IIEP', Paris, 28-29 November, 2001, by Jacques Hallak and Muriel Poisson

‘Combating academic fraud: towards a culture of integrity’, IIEP Series on Ethics and corruption in education, by Max A. Eckstein, 2003

‘Transparency in education. Report Card in Bangladesh. Quality Schools Programme in Mexico’, IIEP Series on Ethics and corruption in education, by Shahnaz Karim, Claudia A. Santizo Rodall and Enrique Cabrero Mendoza, 2004

‘Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring: dimensions, implications and government responses’, IIEP Series on Ethics and corruption in education, by Mark Bray, 2003

‘Formula funding of schools, decentralization and corruption’, IIEP Series on Ethics and corruption in education, by Rosalind Levacic and Peter Downes, 2004

‘Public expenditure tracking surveys in education: Peru, Uganda and Zambia’, IIEP Series on Ethics and corruption in education, by Ritva Reinikka and Nathanael Smith, 2004

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 6th October 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Ethics and Corruption in Education, IIEP, UNESCO site.