|
|
|||||||||||||||
The first Education for All (EFA) goal calls for ‘expanding and improving comprehensive early childhood care and education (ECCE), especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children’. Enrolment in ECCE programmes has tripled since 1970, but access remains limited in most developing countries. Children most exposed to malnutrition and preventable diseases are least likely to have access. Several chapters in UNESCO’s EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, ‘Strong foundations: early childhood care and education’, monitor progress towards the early childhood goal. National governments pay little attention to ECCE compared to two other EFA goals: universal primary education and gender parity. Where ECCE is on the agenda it is usually geared towards ages three and up, and focused on the years before primary school entry, leaving opportunities for younger children overlooked. Public policy for children under the age of three generally focuses only on responding to cases of extreme abuse and neglect. Half the world’s countries have no formal programmes for these children. Recognising the benefits of good-quality ECCE to children, families and society, most industrialised countries – but notably not the USA – provide children with access to at least two years of free publicly-provided ECCE before they begin primary school. Thirty countries have at least one year of compulsory pre-primary education. However, ECCE coverage remains very low throughout the developing world. Staff typically have minimal education and pre-service training and are badly paid. There are major disparities in access within countries. Children from poorer and rural households have significantly reduced chances. Many are excluded by lack of birth or vaccination certificates. Health and education sector plans and Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) may cover immunisation, maternal health and pre-school but are often fragmented. They fail to address the child’s well-being and development as an integrated whole. ECCE policies and programmes are generally divided between two or more state agencies. Fragmented responsibility frequently results in inefficient use of resources. Monitoring of ECCE is problematic because:
In most developing countries policies and supporting legislation are no more than declarations of intent. Legislation relating to international law on children is seldom backed by enforcement. Donors do not prioritise ECCE. They generally allocate to pre-primary less than ten per cent of what they give for primary education, and over half allocate less than two per cent. The 2007 EFA Global monitoring Report calls for:
Source(s): Funded by: Several bilateral donors and UNESCO id21 Research Highlight: 28 November 2006
Further Information: Tel:
+33 1 45 68 21 28 EFA Monitoring Report Team, UNESCO Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||