|
|
||||||||||||||||
School shootings have attracted the most national attention and incited the most panic in the USA out of all forms of school violence. The national and educational media reporting on these acts focuses exclusively on gangs, guns and drugs and fails to consider the gendered dimension of school violence. How can an awareness of this dimension be developed? Failure to recognise and identify gendered relationships as elements of school based violence is reflected in the conventional analysis offered by the national press of the recent spate of school shootings in the US. Most attacks were carried out by white boys upset about the break up of a relationship with a girl friend, rejection by a girl, or because they did not meet traditional community expectations of masculinity. Peer to peer sexual harassment is also rampant. According to findings from the latest survey by the American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (AAUW) in 2000, students in the 8-11th grades revealed that 83 percent of girls and 79 percent of boys have experienced sexual harassment in school, while 54 percent of students admit that they have sexually harassed someone during their school life. Yet, when educators and policy makers consider interventions to curb youth violence, they overlook gender violence. In response, Wellesley College research in the USA, is developing and promoting the notion of 'gender safety'. This aims to shift the national media attention from a singular focus on gangs, guns, drugs and threats of violence to include acknowledgement of gendered dimensions of threats to safety. These are not currently being measured or disaggregated in research or addressed in school or social policy. A landmark case involving a 5 year-long lawsuit filed by the parents of a 10 year old 5th grade female student who had endured sexual harassment by a male student, resulted in the Supreme Court's ruling in May 1999 that officials in all publicly funded schools are liable for peer to peer sexual harassment. This decision charts a sea change in attitudes towards addressing issues of sexual harassment in schools. The girl had endured months of being grabbed in her crotch and breasts and spoken to in a vulgar way by a male classmate. Teachers had ignored her pleas. This case revealed how school staff often witness incidences of sexual harassment but fail to confirm the girl's experiences or to take action because they do not 'label' such incidences as 'sexual harassment'. Current school reforms addressing school safety focus on the creation of a 'zero tolerance' approach - 'one strike and you are out'. Yet, concerns have been raised that with the increased vigilance towards sexual harassment since the Supreme Court ruling, infractions will end up in outright expulsion and suspension of offenders (largely boys), without addressing the root causes of the problems. Recommendations include:
Source(s): Funded by: Wellesley College id21 Research Highlight: 1 February 2002
Further Information: Tel:
+1 (781) 283 2500 Other related links:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||